26Jan Monoprice 2.4Ghz Wireless system Audio tests & the Aspen Lav
I had a little bit of time to test the Monoprice 2.4Ghz wireless system this weekend and it works. The design choices, connector types, and labels aren’t exactly straight forward, and it seems as though the volume controls only affect the headphone output, but for a price of $89, it works.
One of the major questions that I wanted answered about the Monoprice wireless system is “Does it provide power to the lav plug?”. The Monoprice wireless system does provide power to the lav port, and I was able to use a 4 pole (TRRS) to 3 pole (TRS) adapter plug to get things working.
The powered lav mic I used for this test is the Aspen Lav with a 4 pole adapter to 3 pole adapter. While the Aspen mics aren’t ultra high end, there is a very noticeable audio quality difference between the Aspen Lav and the included Monoprice lav mic. As I suspected, the audio quality of this unit is mostly tied to the included low end Lav mic.
Here is the Included Monoprice Lav mic.
Here is the Aspen Lav with adapter using the Monoprice wireless system.
Both samples were recorded through the Monoprice wireless system via the Zoom h1 which was set to an input level of 16.
There a few things to note about the test. First the Monoprice system’s output level is fixed. For that reason I went with an input level of 16 on the Zoom h1 so that it was in the range of gain you’d get out of the lower gain setting you’d use on a DSLR camera.
Second, if you listen closely to the Monoprice mic test at the very beginning you’ll hear a slight digital hiccup. There are 5 wifi networks in the area I was testing and the units were only 4 or 5 feet away from each other. In the short amount of testing I was able to perform, I only heard this digital “hiccup” a few times and I didn’t actually notice it until I listened to the recordings. However, this is probably a red flag for those of you living/working in a highly congested wifi area. I wouldn’t consider 5 wifi networks “congested” and I’m getting a few digital hiccups, how well would this work if there were 7 or more in the same space?
Last but not least, there does seem to be a low, but noticeable digital static sound in the noise floor of the recording. I was traveling most of the weekend so I didn’t have a chance to do more testing, but in the initial tests it does seem to be there. It’s low enough that you could easily remove it with a noise gate and it’s not as noticeable as the low price Audio-technica 88w units, but it does seem to be there.
As for the Aspen Lav, the mic is smaller than a Sennheiser lav. As you can hear in the test above the audio quality of the Aspen Lav is more crisp and less muddy sounding than the Monoprice lav. I’ll post some more audio tests of the Aspen lav recorded directly into the Zoom h1 in a feature post.
If you spend a little extra, Aspen also sells the adapter + mic as a kit for $64 on amazon. The adapter allows you to plug the mic directly into the Monoprice system or use it with your cellphone for remote audio recording. If you already have a nice Lav in your collection you can buy the adapter for $14.
If I get some free time this week, i’ll post some more tests of the Aspen Lav, as well as the Monoprice system. For now though, hopefully this post answers a few of your questions.
January 26th, 2015 at 9:04 am
Thanks DeeJay for all!
I have to search if there is someone who sell it in Europe.
D’oh!
January 26th, 2015 at 9:11 am
Thanks for the test. The Aspen mic has a clearer quality, but that buzz/noise is nasty. I don’t think it could be removed in post without trashing the audio. Could it be the adapter used? If there is a way to use a better quality lav mic with the Monoprice unit, it could be a nice option for people on a budget.
January 26th, 2015 at 9:41 am
I’ll run some more tests with some other lavs I have laying around this week. It might be that the buzz is from the adapter (ground leg lift?), because it doesn’t sound as strong in the native lav mic. Hope to have some more time for testing tonight or tomorrow.
January 26th, 2015 at 9:46 am
Thanks Deejay! Yeah, I noticed the supplied lav mic is louder than the Aspen lav mic. For the lost price, the supplied mic doesn’t sound horrible, but using a better mic would certainly increase the potential value of this very low cost unit.
January 26th, 2015 at 2:19 pm
In Europe i can find only this:
http://www.boya-mic.com/products/show-389.html
Maybe with the Audio Technica Pro ATR3350 is a good compromise…
January 26th, 2015 at 3:37 pm
That looks like the same thing with a different label. Might also be interesting to combine it with an unmodified iRig pre unit.
January 27th, 2015 at 7:07 am
i wonder if the encryption system of Rode is good to prevent the interference with other wifi connection or it works like this Monoprice’s system.
January 27th, 2015 at 7:13 am
I believe it’s to keep the audio from being intercepted, I don’t think it would affect interference.
January 26th, 2015 at 8:10 pm
To me both mics seem to have weak output in this test, but the MonoPrice mic really sounds like a 49 cent mic in my opin, really muddy zero presence reminds me of the sound of a Mr Microphone. The unit it self seems far from clean as well and in my area as Im in the NYC/NJ area I would say this type of device would be worthless for any thing worthwhile there are more then 5 WiFi networks in just the first section of my building let alone my area so forget that for an area like mine.
Price seems cheap yes, but prob not too usfull in anything but the sticks or I am sure the interference from many networks would wreak major havoc. Thanks for the quick test its exactly as a thought it would be in that price range, really poor quality.
Might have some use for some but def not me.
January 27th, 2015 at 1:25 am
It will be interesting to see how the new Rode system will compare since that uses the same frequency and similar tech. At least the Rode system comes with a decent lav. I’ve found that most wireless kits come with lousy lav mics including the Sennheiser G3. First thing I did was sell off the mediocre ME2.
January 27th, 2015 at 7:19 am
I might be off my rocker, but I’ve always liked the ME-2 lavs.
January 27th, 2015 at 5:52 pm
The ME2 is okay and better than other low cost options. But I think the Rode lav is noticeably better. And lavs like the Sanken COS11, Tram and Countryman are much, much better but also more expensive. Oscar Sound Tech, on the other hand, make nice lower priced clones of the Tram TR50 which also sound better than the Sennheiser.
January 27th, 2015 at 7:21 pm
I have the Oscar Sound Tech 801 lav, and just ordered a second one for my second Sennheiser G3. They are an affordable (and apparent) upgrade to the stock Sennheiser lav mics.
http://oscarsoundtech.com/
January 27th, 2015 at 8:40 pm
I’ll check it out, thanks David!
January 27th, 2015 at 12:34 pm
the aspen mic definitely sounds cleaner except for that nasty static….. hopefully it was the adapter used. waiting for your followup with other mics 🙂
January 27th, 2015 at 1:14 pm
Working on it. Probably have something more tomorrow. Going to try recording directly to camera.
January 28th, 2015 at 4:49 pm
no hurry…. been thinking about a decent wireless setup for cheap, but most of the time cheap = crap with wireless setups. Considering i’d use it 2-3 times a year right now, spending an insane amount would be pointless…. this just popped up at the right time…
January 27th, 2015 at 2:50 pm
I ordered the Aspen Mic TRRS kit with the stereo lav. My adapter was unfortunately a lemon and Aspen Mics sent me a new one. I’m worried about the quality of these adapters though and I’d rather run the mic to a Rode VXLR to my Juicedlink. Has anyone tried this? I have seen the video where you use the VXLR, i’m just hoping it’ll work with the Aspen/Juicedlink combo.
January 28th, 2015 at 4:28 pm
Can you recommend a good budget lav better than the Audiotechnica ATR 3350 which I have? I am not very satisfied with it, as it needs a high input level on my Zoom H1. Also I would prefer a lav without battery.
I’m thinking to choose between JK MIC-J 044 (the cheapest, but I read some nice reviews), Aspen Mics, Rode smartLav+ and Giant Squid Audio Lab. Which one should I get?
Thanks!
January 29th, 2015 at 4:04 pm
I’ve been using the Aspen mics for a couple of weeks now and think they are actually fantastic. Very similar to the Sennheiser ME2 sound but so much less expensive. The case and clip are really nice too.
April 23rd, 2016 at 10:06 pm
I have the Aspen stereo lav along with the TRRS adapter. How would I iconnect this to a Juicedlink Riggy Micro 333 which has XLR and phantom power available?
Thomas
April 24th, 2016 at 6:21 am
One of these will do the trick. You wont need the TRRS adapter.