27Oct Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC – First impressions
I picked up the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 on that Amazon warehouse deal I posted awhile back and I’ve been using it quit a bit over my last month worth of travel. Image quality so far has been great and I’ve found the VC (vibration control) a lot more useful then I expected.
The vibration control isn’t going to fix everything, but it really works well for slow steady handheld movements. Volume levels of the VC motor aren’t as loud as the Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS but it’s still loud enough to be picked up by the RODE videomic pro when mounted directly to the camera. I’m not sure whether the noise is picked up audibly or transmitted through the camera body itself, I’ll have to do some more testing.
Tamron made a good design choice by using a raised pad for the AF and VC switches. This makes it very easy to find them by feel, saving the trouble of having to flip the camera around every time you need to turn things on and off. Each switch provides a very reassuring click when operated and the overall build of the lens feels solid.
Fully extend the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 is a long fellow, but it doesn’t seem to be any bigger then Canon’s original 24-70mm f2.8 and it’s weight is very consistent with Canon’s offering (825 g v.s. 803 g), especially when you consider the added VC motor. Focus speeds feel a little bit slower then my prime lenses, but the focus motor is still very quiet and the focus ring supports Full-Time Manual control making it very easy to rack focus.
At 24mm the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 does show a noticeable amount of barrel distortion, this can easily be corrected in post, or if you’re a Canon 5d mark III owner, you can simply make this correction in camera (in camera correction only works with Canon lenses, thanks for the correction Dave). The Canon 24-70mm f2.8 mark II doesn’t suffer from this problem, but at twice the price it might not be a value for people willing to “fix it in post”. One other issue I’ve run into so far is that the lens sometimes errors out my 5d mark III when filming. During a 12 hour day of shooting with this lens, I had two occasions where the camera would report a “lens err” and I had to pull the battery to get it to reset. The two times it happened I was using VC on the lens to shoot an effects sequence at close range (laying on the floor), so I’m wondering if it has anything to do with the power drain caused by the VC motor operation. I haven’t run into the problem on other bodies and I’ve sent in an e-mail to Tamron’s customer support to see if this is a known issue.
Other then the few hiccups, I’ve been very happy so far with the price to performance offered by this lens. I’ll see if that feeling has changed when I finally get to the full review.
October 27th, 2012 at 11:16 am
That’s odd I have never had that error with mine and the 5D3.
Are you sure you can get rid of barrel distortion, I don’t have that available on mine in camera.
October 27th, 2012 at 1:11 pm
The error message is odd, still looking into that. Also you are correct, I was switching back and forth between lenses all weekend, the Shoot1 menu “lens aberration correction” feature is disabled on the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 and enabled on the Canon 24-70mm f2.8. I kept dialing to that to turn off the feature for the Canon 24-70 while I was taking test shots and got them mixed up in my head. I’ll make a correction the post.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:57 pm
Do you notice any “onion” bokeh? Or your application doesn’t matter?
October 28th, 2012 at 2:31 pm
Haven’t had a chance to shoot a lot of bokeh shots yet, but i’m working in the studio all day today, I’ll see if I can snap off a few xmas light shots to see how well they look.
October 28th, 2012 at 10:23 pm
It would be nice if you could do an extensive video review of this lens and provide your opinions about your real world experiences with it.
🙂
October 29th, 2012 at 5:53 am
Working on that. Hope to have something up soon.
October 29th, 2012 at 4:53 pm
Looks like Amazon is having some issues with their batch of Tamron lenses. They pulled their inventory and are investigating the matter. B&H still has them.
October 29th, 2012 at 9:38 pm
Wonder if that has anything to do with the error message I’ve been getting. It would be nice to know what the reason is for pulling the model from Amazons prime service. Most the reviews on amazon seem to be positive. Looks like they still have them on sale as a used warehouse deal. I’ll keep testing mine, hopefully nothing falls off.
October 31st, 2012 at 1:59 am
Me too. Looking forward to hearing good news since I’ll probably pick one up if all goes well.
December 26th, 2012 at 11:39 am
When the Tamron 24 70 lens is attached to the 6D the battery drains at a rate of 2-3 pct per hour even if the camera is off.
December 26th, 2012 at 8:10 pm
I haven’t had that problem.
February 22nd, 2013 at 6:52 am
Deejay, how do you rate the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 now that you have had it for a few months to play with it.
I currently use the canon 24-105l f4 but am considering moving to an faster lens especially for weddings.
Would love to hear your experience with this lens or would you get the canon’s 24-70 mark2 at twice the price?
February 22nd, 2013 at 8:52 am
I find the Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 to be better then Canon’s original 24-70mm f2.8 lens in the optics department. It has IS if that’s something you need and build quality is good to very good. It’s used a lot more then I had expected it would be in my kit. People considered the original Canon 24-70 a great lens for weddings and portraits, the Tamron outperforms it.
The new 25-70 mark II is better optically then the original as well as the Tamron, but unless you are trying to make wall size prints of 22.3-megapixel images the difference isn’t a large enough margin to make it worth the price in my opinion. Hope that helps.
August 18th, 2013 at 4:23 am
I want to buy this lens this week. But I just want to make sure about this lens. Is it good for film? Is it sharp? Is better than canon 24-105 L lens? Thanks!
August 20th, 2013 at 9:26 am
The 24-70 is a great lens. It’s become my go to walk around lens. Very sharp and the VC is very handy.
October 28th, 2013 at 8:30 pm
Hi there!
I am trying to find out about the focus ring on this lens.
My tamron 17-50 2.8 VC focus ring is crappy, very loose. Does not feel professional at all compared to the 24-105.
My other tamron 18-270 is not good as well.
Can you please tell me if the focus ring is a little bit better?
i just can’t find any tamron dealer here in brazil, so i will need to import from B&H after some kind of feedback.
Thanks a lot!
November 14th, 2013 at 8:49 pm
The 24-70mm f2.8 VC has a great focus ring. The lens is one of the best Tamron lenses I’ve used.
April 22nd, 2014 at 10:24 am
And is it possible to add a follow focus? because the focus ring is realy small isn’t it?