22Apr Tascam DR-60D review Video
I could spend some time writing a long description of the Tascam DR-60D, but I think I’ve covered it pretty well in this review. So I’ll just break it down into pros and cons.
Pro:
- Lower price than Beachtek or Juicedlink with more features
- 4 tracks of audio recording
- Large knobs with an easy to use interface
- AA batteries instead of less common 9 volt batteries
- Good audio quality even at high gain settings
- Phantom power
- Plethora of audio interface options
Con:
- No neck strap or memory card included in the kit
- Volume knobs are rotary encoders instead of potentiometers which can cause clicking
- Battery life with 4 AA batteries is only about 3 hours
- The unit is large, about the size of a Canon t2i body
Overall if you don’t mind the size, I think the Tascam DR-60D is a much more comprehensive option then most of the audio interfaces on the market. You can use it with a boom mic as an independent field recorder or as an audio interface for your camera without much problem. It’s $50 cheaper than a Riggy RM333 and a $100 cheaper then the Beachtek DXA-SLR PRO with a lot more features.
You can download audio samples of the Tascam DR-60D in action here(click here). One thing to note, I found the audio from the line out provides a much cleaner and stronger signal when recording directly to the camera. The camera out port set at full volume provided a weak signal to the 5d mk3 in my tests. The audio from the camera out port was acceptable, but just barely. If you plan to use this to feed your camera directly I would recommend using the line out port set at a level of between zero and 2 with your cameras gain turned down as low as it will go without muting the input.
Another useful bit of information is that the Tascam DR-60D always feeds audio to the camera out, headphone out, and line out ports whether you are recording at the unit or not. You don’t have to press record on the DR-60D if you are only using it to feed audio to your camera. Also the mixer menu can be used to mix and balance the audio being fed to your camera. Keep that in mind if you are trying to feed all four tracks of audio into your camera. It could be useful to mix two XLR inputs to the left channel and the 3.5mm audio to the right channel so that you have two isolated tracks to work with in post.
After spending over a week testing and using the Tascam DR-60D, I think it’s going to be something that always comes along when I shoot. I might not be able to think of all the things I’ll be using this for in the future, but I have a feeling having all of those inputs and outputs will be a good problem solver on any production.
April 22nd, 2013 at 11:19 am
Thanks for the great review. I bet you’ll be the only one who will mention the knob issue which seemed to be a big oversight on Tascam’s part. Preamps sound very quiet. It’s just too bad that this has such an awkward form factor but I suppose you could bag this somehow.
April 22nd, 2013 at 12:31 pm
This would be good for a camera mounted on sticks for the shoot
April 22nd, 2013 at 2:03 pm
How do you think this would fair on a wieldy steadicam or glidecam. Seems like this would do some weird stuff to the balance due to the height of it. I’m either getting this Tascam or the beachtech DXA-SLR PRO, do you have an opinion which would be better for a glidecam? My goal is to have two Seinheiser g3 receivers mounted on top or one g3 and one Rode VPS.
April 22nd, 2013 at 2:10 pm
You might want to take a look at the beachtek MCC-2. If you are using two g3’s you don’t really need a preamp. You just need a simple way to mix them down and that little unit will do the trick. That would keep the weight down as well.
I don’t think the DR-60D would be the right choice for a small steadicam, maybe you’d be ok with a larger vest and arm system rated for at least 10 pounds.
April 22nd, 2013 at 2:29 pm
I was all about that when you tweeted about it at NAB, but then I watched the Juicedlink videos and made me nervous that I HAD to have a preamp, just seemed like unneeded weight for what I was using it for. Thanks, your the man.
April 22nd, 2013 at 4:11 pm
No problem. For that application smaller is better, no sense spending the extra if you don’t need to.
April 22nd, 2013 at 6:17 pm
Great review! The battery issue is a big one for me. I would be killing a dozen batteries a day! I’m not paid enough for that kind of waste. The dr60 used to be my top choice, but Zoom’s H6 has a great form factor, and four balanced inputs, although the attaching mics is very gimmicky. On the other hand, I’m always forgetting to record background noise when doing documentary work so leaving one mic going all the time might be nice… I’ve been burned as an early adopter, so I’ll wait till the reviews tear the Tascam and Zoom apart a little more.
April 22nd, 2013 at 8:18 pm
If you decide to go with the DR-60D I’d recommend the Eneloop XX 2500mAh rechargable batteries. You get 5 to 6 hours out of them, and when you’re done just drop them in the charger.
April 23rd, 2013 at 9:34 am
Greg-
I agree with DeeJay, Rechargeables are the way to go. Be aware, the higher mAh number the better and longer the charge, be sure to check that when choosing your batteries. (dont just look at the $)
I use rechargeables for everything that I do. I have a good collection of them and a rapid charger that does a cool down cycle as well (this is helpful in extending overall life of the batteries). You can do some goggle-searching and find something that will fit your budget. As an added bonus, anything you have that runs on AA you can use them for as well.
The initial cost seems high (compared to regular alkaline), but if you run the numbers, usually after one production your are saving money.
April 23rd, 2013 at 1:27 pm
Great review, thanks. do you happen to have any NTG-2 (rode) to test the preamps in this low output volume mic. looking to get a recorder sometime soon and the DR-60 looks great. i got the mic from a friend and the badget is low for me to get another mic.
Thanks again 🙂
April 23rd, 2013 at 1:51 pm
Sorry Nikolas, I don’t have a NTG-2 in the studio to test. I’ll be on set working with another crew on friday, if you’re lucky their sound guy might have one I can grab for a quick test.
April 23rd, 2013 at 2:04 pm
i dont want to put you in any trouble, but that would be perfect. but aside the ntg-2 do you think the preamps are ‘stronger’ compared to dr-40? thanks
April 23rd, 2013 at 2:19 pm
I would say the preamps have more gain in general then the DR-40 or Zoom h4n.
April 24th, 2013 at 12:16 am
Thanks 🙂 keep up the great work
May 3rd, 2013 at 10:53 am
Great review, thanks for the heads up really useful. Just wondering what was the device you used to send the signal to the camera wirelessly? Looks really useful too!
May 4th, 2013 at 10:00 am
The wireless unit is a Wi audiolink.
May 3rd, 2013 at 1:06 pm
Great review, but one thing I wanted to know about is the slate feature … In regards to post syncing the audio files is this a good feature or just a gimmick?
May 4th, 2013 at 9:59 am
The feature makes it easier for programs like pluraleye to sync audio and video. When working in a time line, having the tone at the beginning and the end makes it a little easier to line up audio in post and detect drift. If you are diligent about using it I think it’s a good feature.
June 14th, 2014 at 9:03 am
The slate feature is great, but beware that it is deafeningly LOUD when engaged. There is no reason that the slate signal is so loud, and I wish Tascam provided an option to set the slate level.
June 14th, 2014 at 5:38 pm
The newer firmware allows us to adjust slate volume.
June 14th, 2014 at 6:30 pm
Thanks so much for advising me about the firmware update. This will save my ears!
I wrote to Tascam asking for an adjustment to the slate tone, but never heard back from them, nor any firmware announcements.
BIG THANKS!
July 2nd, 2013 at 4:34 pm
Thanks for this great review!
Would you recommend this to someone new to sound?
Also, I am looking for a good mike set up to use with this.
What did you use and are you happy with it?
Cheers,
July 2nd, 2013 at 9:08 pm
I’ve added this to my standard kit. It’s a handy little unit and audio quality is great. I’ve been using it with 2 wireless kits and a boom mic (mkh 416). The size and features make it really handy.
July 3rd, 2013 at 9:26 am
hi Deejay,
thanks for your response!
Mkh 416 is out of my budget. Have you used another mic successfully?
What wireless kit are you using?
Thanks.
July 10th, 2013 at 8:37 pm
This website is one of my daily visited site! Love all the great articles! And because of this review, I went and got myself the DR-60D plus Tascam’s new headphones TH-02 🙂 thank you!
July 20th, 2013 at 4:21 pm
I just got my 60D and find the recording levels low. I tried it with two ECM-44B lavs, a Sennheiser ME-66 (with its own power) and an NTG-3 (phantom powered through the unit). When the unit is on the low gain setting the sound on all of the mice was unacceptable, barely registered even with the front knob turned all the way up. The lavs absolutely needed the high gain setting to be usable, you could get away with the mid level for the directional mics (and the high blew the sound out). It just seems like a huge swing between the three gain settings, with the lowest a non-starter. I am just talking about recording to the sd card in the unit itself – out to the camera (D800) the levels are higher, but not as clean. Have you found this or could I have a defective unit (very unlikely, obviously). Thanks.
July 30th, 2013 at 12:32 pm
Did you figure it out? I don’t have a 60D so I can’t help.
August 1st, 2013 at 9:00 pm
I didn’t have that problem. I have a mke600 on one and a shure wireless lav. Audio came out really good, setting at mid range, took the audio into premiere and tested with normalized audio, turned speaker all up, no noise.
August 5th, 2013 at 5:44 pm
Very interesting! Thanks for letting me know!
August 16th, 2013 at 3:19 am
Hi, great review. I would add to the “con” the fact that the Tascam DR-60D doesn’t have built in microphones. Tascam might be targeting DSLR shooters that wouldn’t need them anyways but being used to the h4n I think built in mics are always nice to have in an audio recorder. And talking about comparing the Zoom h4n and the Tascam DR-60D, I was reading on a blog that some people consider the audio from the Tascam DR-60D a bit “noisier” than audio recorded on a Zoom h4n. I was wondering if you had compared the two and have an opinion on the matter. Thanks
August 24th, 2013 at 4:23 pm
I have both the zoom H6 and the tascam dr-60d and so far the zoom has more noise than the tascam.
June 14th, 2014 at 9:13 am
The 60D doesn’t have built-in mics, by design. This is designed for people who intend to use something better than the cheap mics built into cheap recorders. None of the built-in mics for these portable recorders sound good, so I always use external mics. By omitting the mics, Tascam removes that cost from the DR60.
Regarding noise level, I don’t own the H4N, but all the reviews I have read suggest the H4N self noise is higher than the 60D.
These inexpensive recorders have a “sweet spot” for what setting works best with different microphones, and you just have to experiment to find it. Microphone and cable noise have to be considered when comparing recorders, but that is often absent in the discussion.
June 14th, 2014 at 10:32 am
Completely agree Dave.
October 22nd, 2013 at 4:09 am
Hi, I bought this DR60 to use with my GH2. I have a cable that I originally bought for my dr100. The cable has a line out tag, I guess I run the line out to the Gh2 mic input. There presumably exists a pad in that cable. So far it seems to work pretty good. Would getting a regular cable to patch between the dr60’s camera OUT and the GH2 better better solution?
April 9th, 2014 at 4:01 pm
I am having trouble with a “motorboat” sound that accompanies my low voice signal when I camera out to my Nikon D7000. I use a Rode shotgun mic to the DR60 and then the camera out.
April 21st, 2014 at 6:30 am
I would like to know which brand/model cards work well with the DR-60.
I have used the Sandisk Ultra (30MB/s) 8 and 16GB cards in my Tascam DR-40 and DR0680, so I presume they will work OK with the DR-60.
I didn’t see any reference to card specs in the manual, but I did find this compatibility chart:
http://tascam.com/content/downloads/products/799/dr-60d_tested_media_list_en_r1_20130315.pdf
April 21st, 2014 at 7:13 am
I’ve been using lower price class 6 and class 10 sandisk cards without any issues. The DR-60 seems to work well with all of them.
April 21st, 2014 at 7:20 am
Deejay – Thanks for the prompt reply. As the Sandisk “Ultra” cards work with my other Tascam recorders, I figure they should work fine with the DR-60. I read some reviews where people were struggling with cards, but they didn’t specify which cards they were using.
Thanks for all your reviews and great information! Very helpful.
June 14th, 2014 at 3:33 am
Like Amy, I’m finding the DR60 has low gain overall. Nothing usable out of 3.5mm mics into the 3/4 input (I’ve tried a Senn Mk300 and an ATRR3550.) Rode NTG1 gives fairly good volume out of channel 1 set to high, at 12 o’clock, as does a wired Senn lav mic. Just getting ok gain from a SM63 wound right up on the ‘high’ setting (it’s a fairly low-gain dynamic.)
Haven’t tried the Senn 816 as it needs 12v phantom, but will next week (I have an external power source).
Not sure if it’s just the collection of fairly cheap (apart from the Senns) mics, but I’m a little disappointed with the DR60 so far. It seems to like hot mics. I guess there may be mics that would be usable on the low gain setting, but so far I’ve had to crank everything. Noise floor is good, but that’s not much use if you can’t get decent volume.
I’m looking at buying a shotgun to use with it – (the xlr mics I’ve tried all belong to my workplace). Love to hear any recommendation/mics that have worked well- at the ahem, more budget end 🙂
June 14th, 2014 at 5:47 am
Addendum: realising I could simply plug the 3.5mm leads into a 6mm adapter, I tried them in channel 1. Much better gain. Still far from terrific (3 o’clock on the high setting) but usable.
So it looks to me like the 3.5mm connection is part of the issue.
June 14th, 2014 at 8:14 am
I use it with an AT4073 and an Sennheiser 416, neither of which require much gain to get a nice strong signal. I only really use the 3/4 input when i’m running an extra mixer or have a stereo lav set, both of which also don’t require much internal gain. Not sure on the ATR 3550, I don’t have any battery powered lavs laying around.